![]() ![]() Since the optimal frequency to define weight monitoring adherence has not been established, we performed additional analyses to explore thresholds for weight monitoring adherence. We conducted this study to compare the association of self-reported and diary-recorded measures of weight monitoring adherence with HF-related hospitalizations. ![]() However, tracking adherence to weight monitoring by diary may be cumbersome for both patients and providers, leading us to speculate how a self-reported measure of weighing frequency that more closely approximates what is commonly used in practice might compare to a diary-recorded measure of weight monitoring adherence. In a prior case–control analysis, we identified that optimal diary-recorded adherence to weight monitoring (≥80% adherence) measured over seven days was associated with a lower odds of HF-related ED visits or hospitalizations. Using weight monitoring adherence measures to determine which patients are optimally performing HF self-care could help identify which patients may benefit from more intensive HF self-care training and support. However, the most clinically meaningful way to evaluate adherence to weight monitoring is unclear. In clinical practice, self-reported measures are frequently used to assess whether patients perform components of HF self-care, including weight monitoring. Weight gain can often be the first sign of volume overload in patients with HF if such weight gains are treated promptly, clinically significant HF exacerbations can be avoided. Weight monitoring is an important element of HF self-care that enables patients to monitor their volume status. Multiple trials have shown that self-care training can reduce HF-related hospitalizations. Heart Failure (HF) causes significant morbidity and mortality. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |